Remise en Cercle: Champagne’s Quiet Secret to Complexity and Correction

Most people with a working knowledge of champagne know there are two fermentations: one to turn grape juice into still wine, and one to transform that wine into champagne. This second fermentation happens inside the bottle and is triggered by the addition of sugar and yeast, a process known as prise de mousse. That, in theory, is where the magic happens...

But what happens when the magic doesn’t happen?

What if the second fermentation doesn’t take? What if the wine develops oxidative notes that were never part of the plan? What if you want to build something even more layered, more textured, more multi-dimensional than your base wines allow? Enter: la remise en cercle.

This technique, long kept behind cellar doors and rarely discussed outside the region, refers to the process of un-bottling champagne (yes, opening up bottles that have already undergone second fermentation) and sending them back into a tank. From there, they may be blended, aged, or corrected, before potentially undergoing a second-second fermentation. In essence, a wine that has already been through the full traditional method loop is placed back in the circle.

---

Where It All Began

Historically, remise en cercle arose out of necessity. In centuries past, second fermentation was far less predictable. If it failed, producers had two options: scrap the entire batch or find a way to salvage it. The answer, quite pragmatically, was to reopen the bottles and rework the wine, sometimes blending it with younger vins clairs or reserve wines, and then reinitiating the second fermentation.

Over time, this emergency manoeuvre became a low-profile tool in the winemaker's toolkit. Today, it continues in a quiet undercurrent, evolving from purely corrective into something more strategic.

When Mistakes Become Material

La remise en cercle isn’t just for fixing fizzless wine. Some producers use it to rejuvenate champagne that has spent too long on the shelf or in the market. Oxidative notes, creeping into the bottle after too many years in less than perfect conditions, can be mitigated by blending the wine back into a fresh base. It’s a reset button of sorts. Not a cure-all, but a valuable option when elegance and typicity are at risk.

This approach is used by Champagne Thiénot, whose house style leans reductive, linear, and often incorporates a signature torrefaction aroma. According to Stanislas Thiénot, when bottles in the market show signs of premature oxidation, they’re bought back, reopened at the winery in Reims or Taissy, and added to the reserve wine base. It’s an extreme move, but for a house intent on preserving its signature precision, it’s worth the cost.

From Necessity to Craft

But not all use of remise en cercle is about salvaging wine past its prime. Some producers embrace the technique as a means to create complexity. Laurent Hostomme, for example, refers to remise en cercle as just "another arc in the bow of a thoughtful winemaker". It’s a technique that allows a different type of assemblage: not just different grape varieties and different years, but wines that have already undergone a full second fermentation.

The result? A "kind of 3D layering" that gives the final blend a new dimension.

High-End, High Stakes: Fleur de Miraval & Moet MCIII

Perhaps the most striking example of remise en cercle as a craft tool is the launch of Fleur de Miraval, the rosé champagne created by hollywood icon Brad Pitt, the Perrin family, and Rodolphe Péters of Champagne Pierre Péters.

To create this prestige cuvée, the team needed aged Chardonnay; specifically, Clos du Mesnil pre 2000s. Péters had previously released a highly experimental cuvée baptised Héritage. This wine included remise en cercle from vintages dating back to 1921, and was limited to 1,000 bottles.

Chef de Cave Rodolphe Péters reportedly went door-to-door in Le Mesnil-sur-Oger, buying up bottles of single cru from neighbours, whether still sur pointe (on their lees) or already disgorged. These bottles were then blended back into reserve wine, forming the Héritage cuvée which later became the base of Fleur de Miraval’s first edition ERI.

Here, remise en cercle wasn’t just a fix. It was a foundational choice, a way to inject depth and gravitas from Champagne’s most revered vintages into a brand-new creation.

Héritage by Pierre Péters - Includes wines dating back to 1921 - Only 1,000 bottle released.

In 2016, Moët & Chandon released a brand new prestige cuvee: MCIII. This wine surfs on the coat tails of great multi-vintage wines like Krug's Grande Cuvée, and Henri Giraud's iconic MV, which are a carefully selected blend of legendary vintages. The 25,000 bottles of MCIII released are an assemblage of 2003 base wine, 2002, 2000 and 1998 aged in oak, and 1999, 1998, 1993 vintages remis en cercle.

MCIII released in 2016 for €450 a bottle.

The Volume Game: Nicolas Feuillatte

Not all uses of remise en cercle are for prestige cuvees. For some large houses, it’s a practical solution to commercial scale.

Guillaume Roffiaen, chef de cave at Nicolas Feuillatte, confirms that remise en cercle plays a role in meeting market demand. If the house needs more wine to fulfil demand but lacks enough in the cellar, they may purchase bottles from external sources that align with their profile, or can be blended until they do. Those bottles are opened, corrected if needed, and reintegrated.

It’s a numbers game. And for the largest brands, a vital one.

A Cousin Technique: Quart de Mousse

While not technically remise en cercle, the quart de mousse technique speaks to a similar ethos of preservation and reserve wine management. Instead of adding the full 24 grams of sugar for a traditional second fermentation, producers like Bollinger add just 6 grams.

This partial fermentation forms a small amount of CO₂, enough to protect the wine from oxidation without giving it full effervescence. These wines are then aged in magnums, allowing slow micro-oxygenation and development.

Champagne Hautbois has also adopted this technique, creating a vast library of reserve wines across grape varieties and terroirs. For both houses, it’s a long-term play: an investment in complexity and character, and an alternative to storing reserves in barrels or stainless steel vats.

So Why Don’t We Hear More About It?

Because remise en cercle is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it can elevate and refine a wine. On the other, it can be seen as a correction, a way to disguise flaws or manipulate volume. In a region so devoted to purity of method, it walks a tightrope between innovation and intrusion.

That’s why most houses won’t speak about it publicly. But make no mistake: it’s there. And when used thoughtfully, it’s as much a part of Champagne’s DNA as dosage, assemblage, or sur latte ageing.

In fact, Champagne may be one of the only places on earth where this technique is not only possible, but financially viable. Whether it’s saving a batch, building complexity, or preserving style, this silent technique reflects the region’s core paradox: perfection, crafted in imperfection.

Sometimes, to move forward, you have to go back into the circle.